Texas Adds Barbed Wire in Eagle Pass, Ignoring Supreme Court Decision
On January 24, 2024, Texas reportedly added more barbed wire in Eagle Pass, ignoring a Supreme Court decision. The Court had ruled that the Biden administration could remove the barbed wire, but Texas went against this and added more instead.
Texas is ignoring the Supreme Court and installing more barbed wire in Eagle Pass.
🔥🔥🔥
— Wall Street Silver (@WallStreetSilv) January 23, 2024
User Reactions:
- Oscar Herrera: “The Supreme Court allowed the Biden administration to remove the barbed wire, but Texas is adding more.”
- Russell: “Is Texas actually ignoring the Supreme Court? The ruling allowed the federal government to cut the wire, not prohibiting Texas from installing it.”
- RichQuack: “Texas is serious about security in Eagle Pass.”
- Suhr Majesty ™: “Standing with Texas!”
- Byron Briggs: “The Supreme Court didn’t rule against Texas installing it. It’s a matter of whether the federal government intervenes or if Texas outpaces removal.”
- Sarasota Freedom: “Biden ignored the Supreme Court’s decision on student loan forgiveness, so eye for an eye.”
- Valentina Gomez: “Protecting this house.”
- Jeffrey R.J. La Tour: “Supporting Texas’ actions. Illegal immigration must be stopped.”
- Rocky: “Federal government failed. Don’t underestimate Texas.”
- The White Rabbit 🐇: “Texas won’t back down from this corrupt government.”
- Josè: “This is essentially a civil war. Keep up the good fight! The country relies on Texas.”
- Rebel Capitalist Pro: “Obstacles are the way. Literally.”
- Drip2Rip 🫵: “Secure the perimeter.”
- Fit Finical Philosopher: “Hilarious.”
- Michael.Rohland: “Fully support this. Great job, Texas.”
- NoahN: “Good.”
- Michelle 🌹: “Rooting for Texas. ✊🏼”
- Susanne Smith: “Good initiative.”
- DOGE MEME NINJA 🥷: “Contains potentially sensitive content.”
In a calm and uninterrupted manner akin to a male news announcer, these reactions from Twitter users reveal a spectrum of opinions regarding Texas’ decision to add more barbed wire in Eagle Pass, despite the Supreme Court’s ruling. From outright support for Texas’ actions to discussions about the legal implications and skepticism about federal interventions, these comments reflect the contentious and complex nature of immigration control and state versus federal authority in the United States.